<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing a Content Management System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheekymonkeymedia.ca/choosing-a-content-management-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheekymonkeymedia.ca/choosing-a-content-management-system/</link>
	<description>Kelowna web design specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Lancia</title>
		<link>http://cheekymonkeymedia.ca/choosing-a-content-management-system/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Lancia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekymonkeymedia.ca/?p=96#comment-101</guid>
		<description>As a vendor, I also think its critical to evaluate the model under which a CMS is offered.  Established SaaS options, like Eden Platform, satisfy all three of your points below:

   1. Beware to much technology: this may or may not be a problem, depending on you level of technical know how. If you struggle to open up a Word document then the easier the better.
   2. Going with an old dog: Even though I encourage you to stay away from the too technical CMS’s, I also recommend that you try to look for one that is updated fairly regularly. An outdated CMS will definitely be more work than what it is worth
   3. Going with the New Dog: The counter part to number two , you want to choose and established CMS. They are likely to have an excellent community that you can turn to for help

Also, our users get the benefit for an indefinite warranty, software updates, and technical support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a vendor, I also think its critical to evaluate the model under which a CMS is offered.  Established SaaS options, like Eden Platform, satisfy all three of your points below:</p>
<p>   1. Beware to much technology: this may or may not be a problem, depending on you level of technical know how. If you struggle to open up a Word document then the easier the better.<br />
   2. Going with an old dog: Even though I encourage you to stay away from the too technical CMS’s, I also recommend that you try to look for one that is updated fairly regularly. An outdated CMS will definitely be more work than what it is worth<br />
   3. Going with the New Dog: The counter part to number two , you want to choose and established CMS. They are likely to have an excellent community that you can turn to for help</p>
<p>Also, our users get the benefit for an indefinite warranty, software updates, and technical support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choosing a Content Management System&#160;&#124;&#160;CMS Den</title>
		<link>http://cheekymonkeymedia.ca/choosing-a-content-management-system/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Choosing a Content Management System&#160;&#124;&#160;CMS Den</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekymonkeymedia.ca/?p=96#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] Link: Choosing a Content Management System [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: Choosing a Content Management System [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
